The presentation sword to Finland (3) 0

The presentation sword to Marshal of Finland C.G.E. Mannerheim

Historical testimony　　　| Presentation sword | Table of contents

Search in a page　|　Tomoyoshi Kadooka and Kokuryūkai

Marshal of Finland Carl Gustav Emil Mannerheim

Marshal Mannerheim was the Commander in Chief in the wars which determined the fate of Finland, such as the War of Independence (1918), the Winter War (1939/1940) and the Continuation War (1941-1944) against Soviet Union.
He is the hero of the independence of Finland having saved the country from the Soviet attacks.

	Mei: Presentation General Mannerheim Japanese Tomoyoshi Sumioka 　Ura Mei: Kasama Sigetsugu Engraving is also the same December, 1935 lucky day ← It is engraving of "Loyalty and filial piety" on a blade.
		Saya-gaki: "A violent soul"→ 　　　　　　Saya-gaki: by Ryohei Uchida 　　　　　　the chairman of "Kokuryukai"

Tomoyoshi Sumioka is the person who acted as the army side defendant's solicitor by the military court of the "May 15th
ident". The reason which had a point of contact with General Mannerheim has unknown him.
The Kasama Shigetsugu had temporarily been indebted in the workshop of Mitsuru Tōyama.
There is a view that Mitsuru Tōyama (Genyōsha) of a nationalist and a right-wing leading figure was involved in this plot.
Ryōhei Uchida, the chairman of the "Kokuryūkai" which is the former student of Mitsuru Tōyama wrote Saya writing directly.
This knife threw into relief Tomoyoshi Sumioka's person image, and the relation of Kokuryūkai for the first time, and
became the interesting evidence which solves the historical fact.

Mitsuru Tōyama 　　　　　　　　　Ryōhei Uchida

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
This modernistic Tachi is guessed from the metal ornaments of a dragon, and is considered to be a presentation sword with which a Kokuryūkai is involved.

The photographs are courtesy of the Mannerheim Museum in Helsinki and offered by Mr.Ronny Ronnqvist.

Tomoyoshi Kadooka and Kokuryūkai

Until now, Tomoyoshi Kadooka was not clear. Ignited by this site, I received offer of precious information from Mr. T.S.
Since it is the important information which illuminates a corner of Japanese modern history, in my dogma and responsibility, I exhibit the contents here.

Tomoyoshi Kadooka acted as the counsel of the army side defendant of the "May 15th Incident", Sago store Tomeo of
Prime Minister Hamada assassination case (1930), and Saburo Aizawa of the Nagata adjutant-general killing-by-stabbing case (1935).
He was a person who is in a very important position in modern Japanese history.

Kadooka had one face which will be accepted as a diplomat. He is known also as an Amharic researcher of Ethiopia and Japanese and Amharic claim him to be the same origin. Kadooka had deep relation in the Imperial Household of the Ethiopia empire. He was doing interesting activity of recommending the daughter of the Kuroda viscount house for the Ethiopia prince's bride etc. (I do not realize this talk by the interruption from Italy).

Although Kadooka who is indignant at invasion of Ethiopia by Italy announced some papers, the publishing agency was a publication section of "Kokuryukai."

In 1931, Kadooka made the organization "Japan Turancilik."
This Turan association is a political movement organization of the way of thinking of "a Turan language family (non-Indo-European languages which overlap with the Urals Altai language family) being collected into one, and
releasing the world where I am troubled with rule of the Indo-European languages."
He claimed that Japanese people should play the central role as a major nation at the easternmost end.
It was called the general-purpose Turan principle, the idea which was world movement of the Ottoman Empire from the first was inherited by Hungary after the First World War, and this was mainly told to Japan from Hungarians. Kadooka
who should be devoted to the relation between Japanese and Amharic came to bear the standard-bearer of the general-purpose ethnic movement of the Urals Altai language family.
This problem has many questions. This leaves a subject at future.

There were many Japanese who believe those days "The human being who lives in Finland, and the human being who lives in Hungary are Japanese and people of the same kind" from the already vulgarized linguistic concern.
On the map, the race world of this "Japanese relative" spread out so that the territory in the Soviet Union might be exactly surrounded with Mongolian, the Turkey system race of Central Asia, Hungary, and Finland from Manchuria.
Manchuria and Kantōgun made the Soviet Union the hypothetical enemy.
Manchuria and Kantōgun had explored the decisive blow of the strategy for Soviet.
Therefore, this general-purpose Turan principle spread through the organization which was making the Soviet Union Kantōgun with the hypothetical enemy, and I performed it.
This way of thinking was close also to activity of Kokuryūkai.

The photograph of the modernistic presentation Tachi to Finland with the metal ornaments of a dragon became precious data which shed light on activity of Kokuryūkai which the actual condition does not understand.
At the time of Japanese knife presentation, it is concluded that there was no personal relation between Tomoyoshi Kadooka and General Mannerheim.

It is because the stamp which should be made "Mannerheim" is mistaken for "Manchinhaim" and also Kadooka is making it engrave with "Japanese people" before one's name.
This has political ideas of a "general-purpose Turan principle" in mind, and is considered to function as one
complaint which emphasizes that it is "Finns and Hungarians are Japanese and people of the same kind."
As backing of the guess, it is mentioned that Tomoyoshi Kadooka has presented the Japanese sword also to Horthy Miklos which is the regency of Hungary in 1936.
The time which presented the knife to General Mannerheim from this must have been in 1936 of the next year of the period stamped on the swod-tang.
Moreover, presentation of the Japanese sword by Tomoyoshi Kadooka has a strong possibility that it was a policy in a political movement called the general-purpose Turan principle in not gratitude and celebration but Japan to General Mannerheim individual.

In Horthy Miklos of Hungary, it has become clear that two sets of armor and two vases other than a Japanese sword are presented together.
Although it is unknown whether this presentation sword indicated to be "valuable Samurai-sword" in the data of Hungary
is still left behind, a presentation sword has a high possibility that it was a work of the Kasama Shigetsugu.

Since sculpture of the "dragon" was given to the hilt Tsuka, the presentation Tachi to Finland may have been presentation from Kokuryūkai (or Kokuryūkai course).
When record of Hungary was tested by comparison, armor might be presented also to Finland and the Tachi may have been
a set of the armor.
If that is right, it will be surmised that all of the present to General Mannerheim and the present to Horthy Miklos regency were based on the investment from Kokuryūkai.
This may be connected with a very big problem when considering the diplomatic history of Japan, Finland and Japan, and Hungary.

(I impute responsibility for all information disclosure of Mr. T.S of this to me)

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　January 8, 2014　

To the top of a page ▲

← Two officers　　Table of contents

The visit-to-Japan Hitler Jugend →